Essay about Case Study Bankruptcy and the Bible - 3614 Words

Case Study: Your long-time friend Carl comes to you with a serious problem in his life. He is a believer, and he wants your advice. For years he and his family have lived above their means. They did this by continually refinancing their house and rolling their credit card and other debt onto their home mortgage. However, now that real estate prices are no longer rising but actually falling, Carl cant refinance anymore and cant pay his monthly bills as they come due. He is in a real credit crisis. His creditors are calling him threatening lawsuits, garnishments, and other unpleasant things. One of his friends at work said that he should file bankruptcy. He comes to you for advice from a Christian perspective. In particular, he wants to†¦show more content†¦26 Truly I tell you, you will not get out until you have paid the last penny. Matthew 5:33-37 New International Version (NIV) Oaths 33 â€Å"Again, you have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘Do not break your oath, but fulfill to the Lord the vows you have made.’ 34 But I tell you, do not swear an oath at all: either by heaven, for it is God’s throne; 35 or by the earth, for it is his footstool; or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the Great King. 36 And do not swear by your head, for you cannot make even one hair white or black. 37 All you need to say is simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything beyond this comes from the evil one.[a] Matthew 5:38-42 New International Version (NIV) Eye for Eye 38 â€Å"You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’[a] 39 But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. 40 And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well. 41 If anyone forces you to go one mile, go with them two miles. 42 Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you. Psalm 37:21 New International Version (NIV) 21 The wicked borrow and do not repay, but the righteous give generously; Ecclesiastes 5:4-5 New International Version (NIV) 4 When you make a vow to God, do not delay to fulfill it. He has no pleasure in fools; fulfill your vow. 5 It is betterShow MoreRelatedLegalization of Gambling Pro/Pro1561 Words   |  7 Pagessupports lotteries which high school students spend thousands of dollars playing, all while increasing problems at home and addiction. The bible points out many quotes disputing gambling. Gambling promotes covetousness and greed (Luke 12:15), Gambling violates the Golden Rule (Matthew 7:12), and Gambling can become addictive (1 Corinthians 6:12) (King James Bible). These statements dont actually say that gambling is evil but the principals definitely suggest evil intentions. Another aspect ofRead More Legalization Of Gambling Essay1545 Words   |  7 Pagesschool students spend thousands of dollars playing, all while increasing problems at home and addiction. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The bible points out many quotes disputing gambling. â€Å"Gambling promotes covetousness and greed† (Luke 12:15), â€Å"Gambling violates the Golden Rule† (Matthew 7:12), and â€Å"Gambling can become addictive† (1 Corinthians 6:12) (King James Bible). These statements don’t actually say that gambling is evil but the principals definitely suggest evil intentions. Another aspect of religionRead MoreThe For The Housing Crisis And The Economic Collapse1002 Words   |  5 Pagesfailings of the parties involved in the financial crisis. There is no denying that the financial crisis has delivered a major to the housing policy. According to Kevin Dowd, a Professor of Financial Risk Management at the Centre for Risk and Insurance Studies, Nottingham University Business School. A moral hazard is where one party is responsible for the interests of another, but has an incentive to put his or her own interests first: the standard example is a worker with an incentive to shirk on the jobRead MoreLincoln Electric Company Essay1024 Words   |  5 Pagesthat company’s success; such as: ï  ¶ The continuing influence of the founders of the company. ï  ¶ The incentive management plan. ï  ¶ The performance appraisal system. ï  ¶ The way people communicate in the company. Lincoln Electric Company 3 Write a three page case analysis that summarizes your understanding of the culture of the Lincoln Electric Company. Being successful in life has ever been an easy thing, let say it is not a piece of cake. All of the successful people have inclined themselves to some rigidRead MoreThe Ethical Systems And Morals Essay1575 Words   |  7 Pagesbinding moral laws, that everything is relative†. (Geisler, 2010) With antinomianism we would go against what laws and morals do exist. Some Christians fall to the belief in antinomianism mainly due to the fat that we sin and God forgives. â€Å"In the case of Christianity, the controversy arises out of the doctrine of grace, the forgiveness of sins and atonement by faith in Jesus Christ. If God forgives sins, what exactly is the disadvantage in sinning, or the reward of obedience?† (Theopedia) â€Å"AccordingRead MoreDeath of the Newspaper: Where Will Journalism Go From Here?1337 Words   |  6 Pagesthe decade is out if Syracuse University professor Vin Crosbie’s prediction comes to fruition (Kirchhoff, 2010, p. 1). However, even if Crosbie’s prediction is off, the numbers are still staggering. Eight major U.S newspaper companies filed for bankruptcy between 2008 and 2010, and hundreds of smaller papers also shut down or switched to Internet only (Kirchhoff, 2010, p. 1). As advertising revenue continues its’ sharp decline and print readership creeps ever lower, it’s becoming ever more clearRead MoreLegal Analysis Of Contract Case Study1779 Words   |  8 PagesCONTRACT ANALYSIS 8 Running Head: CONTRACT ANALYSIS 1 Legal Analysis of Contract Case Study Rachelle Sepich Liberty University Summary of Contractual Issue Marshall and I have an existing business relationship in that I manufacture and supply products that Marshall needs. Generally, the relationship has gone well except for Marshall?s late payments from time to time. Astoundingly, Marshall prepared a contract which was presented as a technicality intended for documentation of commitment betweenRead MoreSlavery : The Old Testament4666 Words   |  19 Pagesit has a clear teaching on ethical treatment of slaves, which was part of the culture of the surrounding nations. Slavery in the bible in the time of the Jews was not an exploitation act but rather an act of enabling the poor to provide for themselves. The word slave was used in referring to various forms of servile situations, not the slave familiar to many modern bible readers. In the ancient Israel, the â€Å"slave† referred to both a person who is under the masters’ law and to any subordinate personRead MoreForensic Science : How Our Cats Companions Can Crack Case s1828 Words   |  8 PagesWrigley (Enriched) Forensic Science 20 December 2016 Forensic Felines: How Our Cat Companions Can Crack Cases For centuries, forensic science has relied on one thing: evidence. That evidence has come in many different forms over the years; it can be derived from eyewitness testimony, ballistics, fingerprints, and even DNA. Investigators painstakingly search crime scenes for clues to solve cases, making sure to check every possible location for a key bit of trace evidence. It is therefore ironic thatRead MoreEssay on Paideia and Modern Educational Policy3842 Words   |  16 Pagespaideia of the early Christian church was the morphosis of Christ and the study of the Bible. In the Book of Acts, the apostle Philip said, I have come to Athens in order to reveal to you the paideia of Christ. Gregory writes, ...the prophet Isaiah educates us... and ...the apostle educates us... What this early force in the evolution of Greco-Christian thought illustrates is the formative function of the object—in this case what is written. This becomes the ...paideutic interpretation of the

Essay about Sex Discrimination - 1597 Words

Introduction Discrimination involves action toward individuals on the basis of their group membership; Baron and Byrne (1994) defined discrimination as prejudice in action. Discrimination can take a very overt form (e.g., refusal to hire women into certain jobs), but in many instances, gender discrimination involves the degree to which the workplace is open to versus resistant to the participation of women. Although many discussions of gender discrimination have focused on the ways managers and supervisors treat men and women, gender discrimination could involve managers, co-workers, subordinates, clients, or customers. In general, gender discrimination include behaviours occurring in the workplace that limit the target person’s ability†¦show more content†¦Additionally, some specific features of the workplace appear to contribute to prejudice and discrimination against both men and women. This research will try to identify and assess gender issues and discrimination in the workplace by looking at various types of sex discrimination, features of the workplace that contribute to gender discrimination, employers retaliation against workers who claim sex discrimination, and conclusively, legal ways of proving sex discrimination and their remedies. Types of Sex Discrimination The Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (as amended) identifies three types of discrimination. These are: (1) direct discrimination; (2) indirect discrimination; and (3) victimisation (Chandler et al., 2003). The 1975 Act, with certain exceptions, applies equally to men and women. It not only forbids discrimination on grounds of sex or gender reassignment but discrimination also against married persons in the employment field. The 1975 Act is, of course, primarily directed towards the protection of women (SDA 1975, ss 1,2,3 4). Features of the Workplace that Contribute to Gender Discrimination Gender discrimination occurs in a number of settings. Men and women are perceived differently, are assigned different roles and are assumed to have different characteristics in most settings, for example household chores likeShow MoreRelatedSex Discrimination Essay1438 Words   |  6 Pagesyou have recently turned down Nancy Conrad for a position as sales supervisor.  Ã‚  Nancy believes the denial was due to her gender and she has filed a sex discrimination charge with the EEOC.  Ã‚  Explain the steps the EEOC will use to process the charge; include Nancy’s options during the process.  Ã‚  Determine the likelihood of success of Nancy’s discrimination claim from the EEOC data base (available through www.eeoc.gov). Describe the basic precautions you should take so you might prevail in her claim. Read MoreThe For The Sex Discrimination Act1006 Words   |  5 PagesThe Sex Discrimination Act 1975 is an act of the parliament of the united Kingdom which protects men and women from discrimination on the grounds of sex or marital status. Employment, training, education, harassment, the provision of goods and services, and the disposal of premises have been concerned by the act. There are four different ways of discriminating racially. These are; Indirect Discrimination; this can occur where there is a policy, practice or procedure which applies to all workers,Read MoreSex, Religion, And Discrimination1132 Words   |  5 PagesHistorically, there has been race, sex, religion, and many other sources of discrimination worldwide. America has come a long way in bringing justice to those who have been discriminated, and to prevent it from happening by implementing relevant policies. However, it is apparent that traces of these historical discriminations have followed us onto the new era of the 21st century. In the past few months alone, there were a few laws executed to stop inequity allowing for: †¢ Same sex marriage, and †¢ Gay/lesbianRead MoreThe Effects Of Sex Discrimination On The Workforce Essay859 Words   |  4 PagesTitle: Sex Discrimination in the workforce Research Topic Sex discrimination is defined when a person is treated unfairly or with less favourable attitude/ characteristics than a person of the opposite sex. The factors that has influenced me to select this specific topic is due to the actuality that sex discrimination against women in the workforce is never taken into consideration by the community. Women in Australia have been fighting for the right to equal pay since the early century. AustraliaRead MoreEssay On Sex Discrimination In The Workplace1014 Words   |  5 Pagesthe courts to be a protected class under Title VII s prohibition of sex discrimination in the workplace? I agree that transgender employee should be considered by the courts to be a protected class under Title VII’s prohibition of sex discrimination in the workplace. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it illegal to discriminate against someone on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, or sex. Sex refers to the biological and physiological characteristics that defineRead MoreRace, Sex, And Religious Discrimination1479 Words   |  6 Pagesmake a difference. Although laws have been put in place to end this, there are still many instances in which countless people are affected by modern day discrimination. Race, sex, and religious discrimination are arguable the three most prevalent forms of these issues still ongoing today. My assigned roundtable’s topic was on sex discrimination specifically. We were asked to focus the recent hiring practices of the Hooters restaurant chain. What was unique to this case was that men were the genderRead MoreSex Discrimination at Walmart Essay1132 Words   |  5 PagesSex Discrimination at Wal-Mart OMM640 Business Ethics and Social Responsibility Dr.: David Britton May 14, 2012 Betty Dukes along with five other women filled a law suit against Wal-Mart Inc. in 2001 for discrimination against women, denying them their raises and also their promotions. Betty Dukes and the other women hope that they can stand for hundreds of thousands of other women who might have been similarly affected by this type of behavior when they wereRead MoreSexism, Prejudice, And Discrimination On The Basis Of Sex1610 Words   |  7 PagesSexism is the prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination on the basis of sex. Sexism is regarded mostly towards women. Sexism affects everyone but not effecting everyone evenly. For women, they suffer from sexism socially, educational, political, religious, social, etc. The idea of sexism is that the men have more power than the women. Women get judged differently than men do. Women get judged in the workplace which limits them to certain jobs. The stereotypes that women are under are unbelievableRead MoreSex Discrimination in the Americ an Workplace Still Stands848 Words   |  3 Pagessense of discrimination against women when it comes to the corporate world. Although women’s overall presence in the work force has seen a boost in numbers in America, men today still get paid more than their female counterparts. To begin with, differences in the pay of workers between both genders seems to be an ongoing issue ever since the time women joined men in the work place. For that reason, â€Å"America made a commitment to equal pay for equal work regardless of the worker’s sex† when theyRead MoreSex Discrimination Law Suit Against Walmart861 Words   |  4 Pagesfemale employees at Walmart filed a class action sex discrimination law suit against Walmart stores in the district court of Columbia. The case talks about discrimination going on in the workplace a group of woman who were discriminated by their gender. Betty Dukes and five other woman were being discriminated they were under paid and denied advancement opportunities. The allegation were that the company’s policy resulted in worldwide discrimination. Walmart was promoting more men than woman this

Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheits Impacts on the World of...

Everything is measured, even the hottest and the coldest temperatures can be measured, and in that case, the word fahrenheit comes into use. the book Word People by Nancy Sorel, defines fahrenheit as â€Å"pertaining to a temperature scale that registers the freezing point of water as 32 F and the boiling point as 212 F under standard atmospheric pressure† (Sorel 99). But the word fahrenheit, itself has its history of its creation, and was named after a physicist engineer, named Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit. Fahrenheit would soon change the world of measuring. Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit was born on Danzig, Germany in 1869. He was one of Concordia and Daniel Schumann Fahrenheit’s five children. He was the oldest amongst his two brothers and three sisters, whom all survived throughout their childhood. Fahrenheit’s mother was the daughter of a well known Danzig business family (Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit Biography ) . His father was a wealthy merchant, and therefore his family was a merchant family, they in several Hanseatic cities . According to the book Word People by Nancy Sorel, at the age of fifteen, both of his parents suddenly died from eating poisonous mushrooms on August 14, 1701 (Sorel 99). His guardian sent him to Amsterdam, Netherlands to study business, where he spent most of his life. He

Immigration and Border Protection Interpretation Adopted by the Court

Question: Discuss about the Immigration and Border Protection forInterpretation Adopted by the Court. Answer: 1. The decision given in this case has very significant implications, particularly when it comes to partner visa. In this case, the unanimous decision of the Full Court was that no temporal limitation is present regarding when the persuasive conditions which have been relied upon for the Schedule 3 waiver should be present. In this context, the court stated that the proper interpretation of sub-clause 820.211(2)(d)(ii) will be that the court can consider the compelling circumstances without taking into account, when these circumstances have taken place. The implication is that the Department as well as Tribunal is not restricted to considering the persuasive circumstances that were present when the application was made. They can consider the circumstances that were arisen after the making of the application and should take these circumstances, into account. The opinion of the Court in this case was since the purpose behind the discretion of the Minister not to apply a Schedule 3 waiv er (or in other words, to waive) Schedule 3, has been provided to the Minister for the purpose of greater flexibility in case of convincing circumstances and, for instance, with a view to evade the hardships faced by the applicants, it will be not be consistent with such a purpose if an interpretation is adopted that the circumstances that can be considered are only the circumstances that were present at some time in the past. The opinion of Dowsett J in this case was that the circumstances that can be banked on for justifying the use of discretion of not applying Schedule 3 must not be restricted, in view of the nonexistence of statutory requirements. Similarly, sub-clause 820.211(2)(d)(ii) does not contain any requirement which places a restriction on the matter is that can be considered as compelling as being only the matter is that were present at the time when the application for partner visa was made. The reasoning of Griffith J was that the authority to dispense with or to waive the requirements prescribed by Schedule 3, is not in itself a criterion of Part 822 Schedule 2. Consequently, in his opinion, the title appearing on laws 820.21 which is the Criteria to be satisfied at time of application cannot be said is having the effect of restraining the consideration of the decision-maker of whether the convincing circumstances were present regarding the matters that were in existence when the application was made. The waiver power that has been mentioned in sub-clause 8320.211(2)(d)(ii) have been mentioned in terms that the Minister is satisfied that compelling reasons are present or not applying Schedule 3 and therefore, it can be implied that the waiver power can be used at the time of the decision regarding the grant of visa and therefore the matters that can be taken into consideration should extend not only to the matters that existed when the application was made but also the matters existing at the time of decision. As the intention behind the introduction of the waiver power was to lessen difficulties, it was important that clear words should be used in the law and principles, restricting the matters that can be considered and as no such language is present, it will not be appropriate to interpret the regulations as restricting the reasons that can be taken into account only the circumstances that existed when the application was made. There is nothing in the Explanatory Statement to the amendments introducing Clause 820.211(2)(d)(ii) that indicates that the circumstances that have been relied upon while seeking a waiver of Schedule 3 should be present when the application is made. In this way, this is where the significance of this decision lies. It was unanimously held by the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia that these provisions do not result in implementing a temporal limitation of compelling and compassionate grounds relied upon when the waiver of Schedule 3 criteria is being considered. Therefore, while integrating the provision mentioned in sub-clause 820.211(2)(d), it was decided by the court that the effect of these compelling and compassionate circumstances will be carried through while the application is being evaluated, and not merely when the application was made. In this way, the effect of this decision is that the Department and the Tribunal under an obligation to consider the circumstances of the applicant that would present when they evaluate the application. Under these circumstances, it can be said that the effect of this decision is to expand the grounds that can be relied upon by the applicants when they are applying for the waiver of Schedule 3. At the same time, another impact of this decision is that it increases the chances for the applicant to remain on shore during the processing of the application. Moreover, it can also be said that this decision will also have a retrospective effect regarding the previous cases by relying on the compelling circumstances that were present at the time of the decision and not merely the circumstances that were present when the application was made. Therefore, despite its current policy, the Department as well as the Courts and Tribunals are required to follow this decision (till the time when the decision has been subsequently overruled by the High Court). The effect is that while deciding the issue of waiving the criteria mentioned in Schedule 3, a much wider scope of circumstances is present that have to be considered by the decision-makers while evaluating the applications. In this way, the decision has significant implications, particularly in case of partner visa. 2. In this case, the Full Court relied upon the principles of statutory interpretation to arrive at the conclusion that the provisions of sub-clause 820.211(2)(d)(ii) have to be interpreted in such a way that the compelling circumstances related with the waiver of schedule 3 can be considered without regard to the fact that when these circumstances have taken place. For this purpose, the court applied the golden rule of statutory interpretation and therefore, while integrating these statutory provisions, it was held by the court that the effect of the compelling circumstances on the basis of which, the waiver of Schedule 3 has been claimed in the application, will be carried through the period during which the application is being evaluated and not only the time when the application was made. As a result of this interpretation, it is required that the Department and the Tribunal are required to consider the circumstances of the applicant when they are evaluating the application and n ot merely the circumstances that were present when the application was made. In this regard, the Migration Regulations, 1994 provide in sub-clause 820.211(2)(d)(ii) that the requirement of criteria described in Schedule 3 can be waived only if the Department believes that compelling reasons exist for not applying the criteria. However, according to the common practice adopted by the Department and also by the Tribunal in the past, only the requirement of the criteria was considered that existed when the relevant application was made. The effect was that any circumstances that were brought to the notice of the Department or the Tribunal as affecting the situation of the applicants after the application has been lodged were not considered while assessing the application. However the effect of the approach regarding statutory interpretation that was adopted by the Full Court in this case was that the court came to the conclusion that the legislation has not imposed a temporal limitation regarding compelling circumstances while considering the waiver of the criteria mentioned in Schedule 3. Therefore, while interpreting this particular legislative provision, it was decided by the court that the impact of compelling circumstances can be considered throughout the period when the application is being evaluated and not only the circumstances that were present when the application for the waiver of Schedule 3 criteria was made. The effect of this approach of statutory interpretation adopted by the court was that the Department as well as the Tribunal is required to evaluate the circumstances that are present when the application is being assessed. It was also stated by the court that a limitation was not imposed by the legislative requirement regarding the relevant time, when it was examined in the criteria was satisfied. On the other hand, it was held that the waiver power can be used by the Minister at his discretion. Adopting the golden rule of statutory interpretation, the court stated that the waiver power has been granted with a view to alleviate hardship and to allow the applicants to have their cases evaluated individually, in accordance with their personal circumstances. As there was no express provision present, which limited the existence of compelling circumstances only been the application was made, rejecting the relevant compelling circumstances that arise when the application was assessed wil l be erroneous. Reference Waensila v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 32